MENU North Carolina
Real Estate Commission

Bulletin Search

A Rose By Any Other Name – Names, Name Changes and Assumed Names

Did you know that Bruno Mars’ real name is Peter Gene Hernandez? If Bruno had a real estate license in North Carolina, he would still need to advertise as Peter Hernandez. A broker may not use a name in their real estate business that is different from the name on their real estate license certificate (which should be their legal name). If Peter Hernandez advertised his brokerage services in the name of Bruno Mars, he would be in violation of the Real Estate License Law.

The following will help guide you in the proper use of your name in advertising.

First Names

Nicknames have always been common, and you can certainly use one in place of your legal first name. The key is to remain readily identifiable to the public and to the Real Estate Commission. Some nicknames are short versions of a longer name and are commonly known. For example, William may go by “Will” or “Bill,” Robert by “Rob” or “Bob,” and Elizabeth by “Liz,” “Beth,” or even “Betsy.” In these kinds of situations, you may use a nickname because your actual name can be easily determined. Similarly, a nickname involving the use of initials in place of your given name is acceptable, as when Thomas Joseph Jefferson goes by “T. Joseph Jefferson” or even “T.J. Jefferson.”

Other nicknames are not logically associated with the user’s first name. For example, if your name is Midlemas Phestus Jones and you use a nickname like “Purple,” a member of the public would have no way of knowing that you are actually “Midlemas.” In order to assure that you can be easily identified, your business cards and correspondence should include your full name together with your nickname. This can be done in various ways. For example, your business card might read, “Midlemas ‘Purple’ Jones, Broker,” and your social media ad could say, “For all your real estate needs, call Purple! (M.P. Jones, Broker).”

Last Names

On the other hand, using a surname that is not your own is not allowed. If you have an awkward or lengthy surname, you may wish that you could shorten or simplify it only in connection with your real estate business. While the goal is understandable, the result is misleading if you haven’t legally changed your name. For instance, if your surname is Furplesnurkle, you can’t simply call yourself “Mr. Furp” or “Mr. Jones” in your brokerage activities, if your legal name remains Furplesnurkle. If a consumer wishes to confirm that you are licensed or wants to file a complaint, it is imperative that you are identifiable.  If you want to become “Furp” or “Jones,” you must legally change your name. The most straightforward way to do this is to go through a judicial name change proceeding before the clerk of court in the county where you reside.

Marital Status

But what about your wife who is also a broker–Mrs. Furplesnurkle? Before she married you, her maiden name was Myrtle Evans. What name can she use now in her brokerage activities? The answer depends on whether she legally changed her name upon her marriage. If she did, then she must use her new, legal name, “Myrtle Furplesnurkle” or “Myrtle Evans Furplesnurkle.” In addition, she must notify the Commission that she has legally changed her name by filing a Request Broker Name Change and to Reissue Real Estate License/Pocket Card form (https://www.ncrec.gov/namechange ) to have her license reissued in her new name. She will need to upload a copy of the marriage certificate and a copy of her driver’s license or other state issued ID with the new name. Myrtle cannot be Myrtle Furplesnurkle to family and friends but be Myrtle Evans on advertising.

If Myrtle did not legally take your name, she must continue to use her maiden name until she legally changes it.

If you later divorce and she wants to revert to her maiden name, she may apply to the clerk of court in the county where she lives. Upon legally resuming her maiden name, she must again notify the Commission on the same form she used when she married you and her license will be reissued in her maiden name.

 Assumed Names

If you don’t want to go to the trouble of changing your name legally, then you should use your legal name in all aspects of your business. You cannot avoid the problem by filing an assumed name registration in the office of the register of deeds. That procedure is only for business names – not for individuals who wish to have a “stage name” like Bruno.

What is an “Assumed Business Name”? For example, when an individual broker/sole proprietor named Alex Robinson advertises as Robinson Realty, Alex is not using an assumed name because Robinson Realty includes the broker’s surname.

If Alex Robinson instead advertises brokerage services (with business cards, ads, etc.) as broker-in-charge of a sole proprietorship under the name, “Luxury Homes 4U Realty,” Alex is now using an assumed business name and must comply with the statute and Commission rule.

The Commission recognizes Assumed Business Names (aka DBAs) for licensed firms and for sole proprietorships, not for individual brokers. Accordingly, the designated broker-in-charge of a sole proprietorship may submit the Request Firm/Sole Proprietorship Name Change and to Reissue Real Estate License/Pocket Card form once they have filed an assumed name certificate for their company. Again, an assumed business name is not meant for Alex Robinson to use the stage name Alex Star when he is really Alex Robinson.

However, if you see an advertisement for Elton John’s brokerage services, it’s okay. He legally changed his name from Reginald Kenneth Dwight back in 1972.

Postlicensing and CE – Myths vs. Reality

What are the differences between the Postlicensing (PL) and Continuing Education (CE) programs? Do they interact with each other? Who is required to complete the courses – and when?

Following are the rules regarding the Postlicensing and CE programs, key points about rule requirements, and clarification of three common myths about the programs.

Postlicensing (PL) Education

Rules 58A .1901-.1905 and 58H .0101-.0415

Key Points:

Continuing Education (CE)

Rules 58A .1701 -.1712 and 58H .0101-.0415

Key Points:

MYTHS and REALITY

MYTH: If a PB completes all three PL courses within the first year of licensure, the broker will have to take CE right away.

REALITY: PL and CE are separate programs. Completion of PL courses does not affect CE deadlines, nor does completion of CE affect PL deadlines.

Example: Provisional Broker Pat was licensed on August 24, 2021.

MYTH: You have to complete CE before you can renew your license.

REALITY: CE and renewal are separate requirements.

Licenses must be renewed annually during the May 15-June 30 renewal period. If a license is not renewed by June 30, it will expire.
In order to maintain active license status – or be eligible for active license status – brokers must complete CE each year between July 1-June 10.
In other words, you can renew your license as early as May 15 and complete your CE as late as  June 10. Also, you can renew your license without completing CE; in such case, your license will be on inactive status but will not expire on July 1.

MYTH: The content of the Update course is the same every year.

REALITY: The Commission determines Update course topics each year based on industry issues and trends.

Update course topics and materials from previous years are provided on this page. Do you have questions about the PL or CE programs? Contact the Education and Licensing Division at LS@ncrec.gov or 919.875.3700, x772.

Current Stats: Monthly Licensee Count as of February 1, 2022

CE Required for Brokers with BIC Eligible Status

Do you have BIC Eligible status? Are you a designated BIC? Do you know which CE courses you need to take?

Rule 58A .1702 requires brokers who hold BIC Eligible status to take the BICUP (Broker-in-Charge Update) course and one Commission-approved elective each year in order to maintain active license status and BIC Eligible status. A broker with BIC Eligible status who takes the General Update course and an elective will maintain an active license but will lose BIC Eligible status (and, in turn, BIC designation).

For more information or to ask a question, contact the Education and Licensing Division at LS@ncrec.gov or 919.875.3700.

Staff Appearances

Sheryl Graham, Consumer Protection Officer, spoke at the Greater Orange Chatham County Board of REALTORS meeting on January 12.

Disciplinary Actions

YECENIA BANEGAS (JOHNSTON COUNTY) – By Consent, the Commission suspended the broker license of Ms. Banegas for a period of 2 years effective January 10, 2022. The Commission then stayed the suspension in its entirety. The Commission found that Ms. Banegas bought and renovated a residential property and relied on unlicensed contractors’ advice in failing to obtain necessary permits. Ms. Banegas listed the property without disclosing that she had not obtained permits or hired licensed professionals to do renovations including relocating a wall, and connecting an HVAC system to a room. Ms. Banegas also failed to discover and disclose serious termite damage in the crawlspace. The Commission noted that Ms. Banegas had refunded the buyer their fees and deposits after they terminated the contract.

DANIELLE SEANTE GADDY (FAYETTEVILLE) – By Consent, the Commission suspended the broker license of Ms. Gaddy for a period of 18 months effective January 1, 2021. The Commission then stayed the suspension in its entirety. The Commission found that, as qualifying broker/broker in charge of a firm, Ms. Gaddy failed to complete required annual continuing education (CE) which resulted in her license being “inactive” from October 8, 2020, through November 6, 2020 and the firm’s license being “inactive” from October 8, 2020, through October 29, 2020. Despite this, Ms. Gaddy continued to enter into agency agreements and represent clients in submitting offers to purchase. Ms. Gaddy failed to notify the Commission within ten (10) days of the firm being administratively dissolved by the NC Secretary of State. Ms. Gaddy has since had the firm reinstated. In a transaction where Ms. Gaddy acted as the listing agent, the Commission found that she showed the subject property, with her seller-client’s approval, to a potential buyer three days prior to marketing the property in the MLS. Ms. Gaddy also added the phrase “not the procuring cause” in the selling agent section of an offer to purchase contract submitted by the buyer’s agent. The property ultimately went under contract with a different buyer.

JOHN LIGHT (KILL DEVIL HILLS) – The Commission accepted the voluntary surrender of the broker license of Mr. Light for a period of 1 year effective December 15, 2021. The Commission dismissed without prejudice allegations that Mr. Light violated provisions of the Real Estate License Law and Commission rules. Mr. Light neither admitted nor denied misconduct.

GEBA RENEA MCDANIEL (WINSTON-SALEM) – By Consent, the Commission suspended the broker license of Ms. McDaniel for a period of 2 years effective December 30, 2021. The Commission then stayed the suspension in its entirety. The Commission found that Ms. McDaniel was the broker-in-charge and qualifying broker of a property management firm which allowed an unlicensed broker, and his unlicensed firm, to conduct brokerage activities. Ms. McDaniel failed to notify the Commission within ten (10) days of her firm’s administrative dissolution by the NC Secretary of State. Ms. McDaniel’s management agreement with the property owner failed to contain all provisions as required by Commission rules. Ms. McDaniel, acting as a buyer agent, referred various clients to a credit repair/restoration company to assist with raising their credit rating and failed to disclose that this company was owned and run by her husband.

DEBORAH STALL PORTH (CHARLOTTE) – By Consent, the Commission suspended the broker license of Ms. Porth for a period of 2 years effective January 15, 2022. The Commission then stayed the suspension in its entirety. The Commission found that Ms. Porth was qualifying broker/broker in charge of a Firm, whose company policy was to run a background check on every prospective tenant 18 years of age and older. In 2019, the Firm leased a property to three adult brothers without collecting the listed tenant security deposit or prorated rent, and after obtaining a background check for only one applicant rather than each tenant. The “overall recommendation” in the background report was to DECLINE that applicant. The tenants were late with their rent or did not pay rent while they were living in the property, did not vacate when their lease expired in October 2020, and were evicted in January 2021 still owing rent. The Commission noted that Ms. Porth personally paid the owner the missing tenant security deposit funds. Ms. Porth also failed to timely account for or disburse a tenant security deposit to a tenant despite re-renting the property within three weeks of the tenant’s vacating, and failed to maintain trust account records in compliance with Commission rules.

Employment Opportunities Available

Are you interested in joining the staff of the North Carolina Real Estate Commission? From time to time, employment opportunities become available. They are posted on the Commission’s website under the “About Us” tab.

We currently have opportunities available for the following positions:

Auditor – Audit trust account records of real estate brokers state-wide and investigate consumer complaints. Application deadline February 11, 2022.

Click here for more information.

But the Seller Breached! When Should Due Diligence Fees be Refunded?

In today’s hot market, due diligence fees have become a significant consideration for both buyers and sellers. The commonly used NC REALTORS©/NC Bar Association Offer to Purchase and Contract (Form 2T) incorporates a due diligence period for which the buyer may pay a negotiated fee. Some brokers are encouraging their buyer clients to offer considerable amounts in due diligence fees to make their offer more competitive, and some buyers do so even against their broker’s advice. 

First, it’s important to note that the parties are not required by law or by the Commission to either use the form provided to brokers by their trade association or to include a due diligence fee as part of their contract. The parties are always free to have their own attorney draft a contract for their transaction or to choose not to offer a due diligence fee. Brokers should be careful to not imply otherwise.

The Commission has seen a major increase in complaints from buyers insisting they are owed a due diligence fee refund because a home inspection discovered an issue with the property which was not disclosed prior to going under contract. If a buyer is offering thousands of dollars in due diligence fees to secure a contract, they need to be fully aware that the fee is generally not refundable, even if the inspection reveals material defects in the property. The rights of a buyer during the due diligence period are the same whether they have paid $0, $100, or $100,000 in due diligence fees.   

Brokers should never lose sight of the goal: doing what is best for the client rather than getting a bad contract in place. A good broker will always be sure to take the time to clearly explain the risks to the buyer in paying any amount of due diligence money. A broker’s fiduciary duties to their client include loyalty, obedience, accountability, disclosure, and skill, care and diligence.  When a buyer has hired a broker for their expertise and assistance in making what frequently amounts to the largest purchase they’ll ever make, then the expectation is that the broker will be looking out for their best interests. 

A broker’s best practices include being well versed regarding the terms of a contract and educating their client on all of the ins and outs of due diligence, including the risks involved and when a fee is refundable.

The Due Diligence Period is designed to allow the buyer:

  1. a period of time to inspect the property and determine if they wish to accept it in its current condition
  2. the opportunity to request repairs and negotiate the repairs and costs with the seller,
  3. access to the property for any and all inspections, surveys, appraisals, etc. and
  4. the right to terminate the contract unilaterally prior to the end of the due diligence period for any or no reason.

It’s a common misconception that a seller has ‘breached the contract’ by failing to agree to pay the cost of repairs or for not disclosing a defect in the property. While the buyer may seek to negotiate repairs, the contract does not obligate the seller to make any repairs. The seller’s obligations under the contract Form 2T are in Paragraph 8 and only relate to repairs to the extent that the seller has agreed to perform them. Specifically, the contract requires the seller to:

  1. provide evidence of clear title and a General Warranty Deed and payoff of all existing liens with an affidavit regarding payment,
  2. pay ad valorem taxes, pro-rated property taxes and any late listing fees, confirmed special assessments, Owner’s Association fees and certain charges payable by seller, and any agreed-upon buyer’s expenses,
  3. provide access to the property for the buyer including working utilities,
  4. remove the seller’s personal property, garbage and debris, and
  5. perform all repairs that have already been negotiated and agreed upon by the parties.

If the seller fails to perform those obligations, thereby breaching the contract, then the buyer may be entitled to a refund of their due diligence fee along with any earnest money, and costs incurred performing their due diligence (see paragraph 23 for the remedies). 

The contract makes no guarantee as to the condition of the property and, under paragraph 4(d), states that the property is being sold in its current condition. Brokers should make buyers aware that the Residential Property and Owners Association Disclosure Statement is not a guarantee of the property condition. A seller’s answer of “no” or “no representation” on the disclosure statement does not mean that there are no problems or defects in the property, only that the seller is either unaware of a problem or has chosen to make no representation. A deliberate misrepresentation by a broker may result in disciplinary action. Similarly, a deliberate misrepresentation by an unlicensed seller could result in civil liability if a buyer chose to pursue a private civil suit. However, the Commission has no authority to award such damages. The bottom line? Brokers should advise their buyer clients early and often that they should not expect a refund of any due diligence fee they pay even if they are dissatisfied with the condition of the property. Brokers should do everything they can to ensure that their buyer-clients are well-informed and offer an amount of due diligence fee that they are prepared to lose.

Disciplinary Actions

YECENIA BANEGAS (JOHNSTON COUNTY) – By Consent, the Commission suspended the broker license of Ms. Banegas for a period of 2 years effective January 10, 2022. The Commission then stayed the suspension in its entirety. The Commission found that Ms. Banegas bought and renovated a residential property and relied on unlicensed contractors’ advice in failing to obtain necessary permits. Ms. Banegas listed the property without disclosing that she had not obtained permits or hired licensed professionals to do renovations including relocating a wall, and connecting an HVAC system to a room. Ms. Banegas also failed to discover and disclose serious termite damage in the crawlspace. The Commission noted that Ms. Banegas had refunded the buyer their fees and deposits after they terminated the contract.

DANIELLE SEANTE GADDY (FAYETTEVILLE) – By Consent, the Commission suspended the broker license of Ms. Gaddy for a period of 18 months effective January 1, 2021. The Commission then stayed the suspension in its entirety. The Commission found that, as qualifying broker/broker in charge of a firm, Ms. Gaddy failed to complete required annual continuing education (CE) which resulted in her license being “inactive” from October 8, 2020, through November 6, 2020 and the firm’s license being “inactive” from October 8, 2020, through October 29, 2020. Despite this, Ms. Gaddy continued to enter into agency agreements and represent clients in submitting offers to purchase. Ms. Gaddy failed to notify the Commission within ten (10) days of the firm being administratively dissolved by the NC Secretary of State. Ms. Gaddy has since had the firm reinstated. In a transaction where Ms. Gaddy acted as the listing agent, the Commission found that she showed the subject property, with her seller-client’s approval, to a potential buyer three days prior to marketing the property in the MLS. Ms. Gaddy also added the phrase “not the procuring cause” in the selling agent section of an offer to purchase contract submitted by the buyer’s agent. The property ultimately went under contract with a different buyer.

JOHN LIGHT (KILL DEVIL HILLS) – The Commission accepted the voluntary surrender of the broker license of Mr. Light for a period of 1 year effective December 15, 2021. The Commission dismissed without prejudice allegations that Mr. Light violated provisions of the Real Estate License Law and Commission rules. Mr. Light neither admitted nor denied misconduct.

GEBA RENEA MCDANIEL (WINSTON-SALEM) – By Consent, the Commission suspended the broker license of Ms. McDaniel for a period of 2 years effective December 30, 2021. The Commission then stayed the suspension in its entirety. The Commission found that Ms. McDaniel was the broker-in-charge and qualifying broker of a property management firm which allowed an unlicensed broker, and his unlicensed firm, to conduct brokerage activities. Ms. McDaniel failed to notify the Commission within ten (10) days of her firm’s administrative dissolution by the NC Secretary of State. Ms. McDaniel’s management agreement with the property owner failed to contain all provisions as required by Commission rules. Ms. McDaniel, acting as a buyer agent, referred various clients to a credit repair/restoration company to assist with raising their credit rating and failed to disclose that this company was owned and run by her husband.

DEBORAH STALL PORTH (CHARLOTTE) – By Consent, the Commission suspended the broker license of Ms. Porth for a period of 2 years effective January 15, 2022. The Commission then stayed the suspension in its entirety. The Commission found that Ms. Porth was qualifying broker/broker in charge of a Firm, whose company policy was to run a background check on every prospective tenant 18 years of age and older. In 2019, the Firm leased a property to three adult brothers without collecting the listed tenant security deposit or prorated rent, and after obtaining a background check for only one applicant rather than each tenant. The “overall recommendation” in the background report was to DECLINE that applicant. The tenants were late with their rent or did not pay rent while they were living in the property, did not vacate when their lease expired in October 2020, and were evicted in January 2021 still owing rent. The Commission noted that Ms. Porth personally paid the owner the missing tenant security deposit funds. Ms. Porth also failed to timely account for or disburse a tenant security deposit to a tenant despite re-renting the property within three weeks of the tenant’s vacating, and failed to maintain trust account records in compliance with Commission rules.

Current Stats: Monthly Licensee Count as of January 1, 2022