“Lease-To-Own” versus “Lease Option”

A Regulatory Affairs Division Case Study By Nicholas Smith, Consumer Protection Officer The Commission received a complaint from a seller against her listing broker. The broker listed the residential property for sale at $45,000 and acted as dual agent. Due to the condition of the property, the broker believed that traditional financing was going to be unavailable. After procuring a buyer, the broker suggested a lease-to-own arrangement. Both parties were open to the idea and negotiated terms. The buyer would pay a deposit, make regular payments over a three-year period and, at the conclusion of the period, the seller would … Continue reading “Lease-To-Own” versus “Lease Option”